Someone must create atleast the first atom, (of hydrogen/helium) necessary to create stars. Who did? Let's say The Creator.
Someone must destroy atoms back to whatever they were created from, to obey conservation and to put check on creation. Who does? Let's say The Destroyer.
Someone must preserve existing creation from being destroyed. Who does? Let's say The Preserver.
Now who created the Creator? Can creator be created? If yes, then we need a super creator to create the creator. So creator cannot be created. And since creator cannot be created he is not subject to destruction like his creation. Hence creator can neither be created or destroyed. And thus not even subject to preservation, because it cannot be destroyed.
Who created the destroyer? Can destroyer be created? If yes, then destroyer is no better than rest of creation, and is subject to destruction like rest of creation. But Destroyer should be someone who cannot be destroyed, because if he can be, then we need a Super Destroyer to destroy the destroyer. Hence, Destroyer cannot be created or destroyed either. And thus not even subject to preservation, because it cannot be destroyed.
Who created the preserver? Cannot be creator because preserver cannot be destroyed. If he were to be destroyed, then how will he preserve the creation? If preserver were to be created, we need a super preserver to preserve preserver himself! We cannot have a super preserver for preserver. Hence preserver cannot be created, or destroyed.
These three devils or angels, sustain the melodrama, and orchestrate all reality to their whims, and fantasies. Each independent of the others, and yet their actions harmonize into this beautiful universe!
Without creator, there is no creation and thus no need for preserver or destroyer.
Without destroyer, there would be no new creation, stalling the creator.
Without preserver, there would be no manifestation of creation. Creator and destroyer would almost crash into each other.
Creation and Destruction give birth to each other. In creation, there are seeds of destruction, and in destruction seeds of new creation. Nothing lasts forever except for the delightful competition amongst the creator, the preserver, and the destroyer!
2 comments:
Interesting blog. You may want to check out my blog "Framptonia" at nathanframpton.blogspot.com . I have a few contributors and there are some great discussions.
You may also want to try blog explosion to get more readers on your blog. I have a blog explosion link on my blog if you are interested.
Just as a watch is too complicated and too functional to have sprung into existence by accident, so too must all living things, with their far greater complexity, be purposefully designed. But as Richard Dawkins demonstrates in this brilliant and eloquent riposte to the Argument from Design, the analogy is false. From "The Blind Watchmaker"
Post a Comment